Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Michael Moore on WikiLeaks: 'Leaks Don't Kill People, Secrets Do' mmflint 588 videos Subscribe Subscribed

Michael Moore, explaining why he posted bail for Assange, put it this way: "WikiLeaks exists, in part, because the mainstream media has failed to live up to its responsibility. The corporate owners have decimated newsrooms, making it impossible for good journalists to do their job."


WikiLeaks isn't so much picking up the slack as deposing a craven charlatan, a media whose "servile role...[is] serving government interests and uncritically spreading government claims." Glen Greenwald

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Monday, December 27, 2010

My Virtual New Year’s Resolution 2011





One of the things that disturb me about the internet and particularly online comment/discussion groups such as the Huffington Post, NY Times and the many others such as this one is that too many contributors seem to have an opinion cast in a vitriolic tenor of absolute. While the collective wisdom can be worth the effort sometimes it rapidly becomes painful to wade through the caustic demeanor and lack of decorum which seems to have become almost universal at this point.

Personally, I blame the shock jocks and irresponsible media figures such as Glen Beck, Bill O’Reilly, Rush Limbaugh and the many others who abuse the responsibility that was once understood, practiced and which should accompany their profession. Today it seems that online participants emulate those behaviors and I rarely find a well framed question or an effort by another participant to seek understanding. Too often their impatience turns to personal attack.

For the most part, anything else most likely should be considered little more than dogma. Conclusions abound, facts are few, if you want to make a difference in 2011 then learn to decipher fact from opinion, seek to understand and refrain from assertions of knowledge when true knowledge is most illuminated by a well framed question that leads to learning and understanding. You can save yourself a lot of time and reclaim some of your sanity from the virtual black hole of ignorance by ignoring the rest.

My New Year’s resolution and wish for America is to replace a conclusion with a question and a conclusion with a fact. To quote a mentor of mine, “facts win cases”…Littleton M. Gunn, Esq. (sometime in the late 80’s)

This is my personal effort to win this case and to restore intellect, civility and humility in America. I hope each of you will consider this a contribution. If not, please explain, and save your opinions for those who have more of their life to squander.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Sunday, December 26, 2010

Ever Braver, Ever Stronger (An American Elegy)

Composition of Gordon Goodwin performed by the Big Phat Band, solo trumpet featuring Wayne Bergeron.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Jon Stewart - Moment of Sincerity

Rally to Restore Sanity and/or Fear
Jon Stewart - Moment of Sincerity
http://www.comedycentral.com/
Rally to Restore Sainty and/or FearThe Daily ShowThe Colbert Report
Jon Stewart takes time to talk about why exactly he held the Rally to Restore Sanity. His message is an excellent reflection of our challenges going into 2011

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, December 25, 2010

Refusing to Criticize Schwarzenegger






It is easier to criticize Governor Schwarzenegger that to praise him for showing us what is actually wrong with the system. I believe he earnestly attempted to positively and constructively influence Sacramento’s lawmakers and failed. Not his fault is my opinion, because he did so in the best way he could reckon from the stormy currents he faced. He attempted to deliver on his campaign promises and his public service was just that, not self service!

With that said, it is likely true that he overestimated and actually didn’t understand the challenge. Naive’ ok! I’ll take that every day over the likes of Meg Whitman, Carly Fiorina or for that matter George Bush.

I will remember Governor Schwarzenegger as a man who challenged bureaucracy and attempted to build a consensus to bridge the gaps of partisanship. Saying he was naive’ is not a slam because it is clear that few actually do understand and even fewer are willing to discuss what is broken and why. But before I take issue with what is truly dysfunctional in California I want to be on the record for saying that in my mind, Governor Schwarzenegger deserves our respect for attempting to work within and use a system that is broken and built to fail. He deserves our respect for refusing to sign a budget where prisons are given more money than education. He deserves our respect for being a public servant and not a self servant the most uncommon commodity in today’s political arena.

Fear mongers and their special interests friends make an end run on our legislature at every bump in the road. It is California’s initiative process that enables, fosters and continually undermines our governing structure and processes. Why bother electing and paying a state legislature lets save the money. We’ll do our own legislating so why have two? This is the hyper-partisanship we refer to when we discuss Sacramento. The Initiative process makes laws that have not been budgeted for or analyzed, debated and scrutinized. Yet we continue to fund them and leave the how to, for Sacramento and the Governor. California wake up; these problems are not partisan they are special and self interests. Follow the money; look to see who those special interest groups are and you will solve the problem. Thank you, Arnold for giving it the old college try. Your legacy is a good one in my book. (http://thirdcloud-yourhonormayibeheard.blogspot.com/)

Labels: , , , , ,

Thursday, December 23, 2010

Getting to Know the World’s Most Important Economy







In a recent LinkedIn discussion about facts that will blow your mind, I commented to a member of our White House Group and one of our colleagues… you are dead on in that, China's communist party is afraid of its own people, as they should be! Roughly, 80% of their population was born after their communist form of government came into power. They do not, and are not in support of their form of government. I have traveled to China with and for a group of scientist I have represented since 2001. These are my personal observations and beliefs.

Over the last decade China's government has allowed for more liberal economic entrepreneurship and individual wealth. Beijing can boast of having a large concentration of millionaires. I agree that these are the cadres that most likely will flee China when the s^*t hits the fan. But they are not strongly behind the currently empowered communist government regime. In fact they much like our own corrupt elected government serve the economic interests of their funders. They too would likely morph toward or into a new styled democracy if they could balance some economic continuity. In China, for the most part the economic choices were individually hard earned not gifted.

I don't agree that China will fall apart in 2011 because economically they do have a mechanism upon which to build and sustain a democracy unlike Russia. To their credit China has invested in their greatest resource, human capital. A lesson our own government should learn. In short, the communist regime has maintained support by allowing for some prosperity within its borders. That does not mean that their huge population buys into supporting their government or that those who have benefited will give their continued support.

The word is out and they are aware, of a better way. I think the real question is what are we showing China here in the states? What are we teaching China about fundamental freedoms when our US Senators propose censorship legislation and favor corporations over our people? What are we in the real world, not in our own aggrandized perception? They see what we do not and value more what many have forgotten or never learned. China now listens less to what we say, but pays attention to what we show them! The only given in 2011 will be change!

Labels: , , , , , ,

Monday, December 20, 2010

Bill "The Snowman" O'Reilly and Faux News Network Christmas Wish

The Faux News Network and Bill "The Snowman" O'Reilly announces newest book, "Punks, Pinheads and Patriots; Roger Ailes demands Nobel Prize award for Faux Snowman O'Reilly; Holiday wishes for all America except George Soros and Barack Obama

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Bill O'Reilly's Spin Zone Episode 2

Bill "The Snowman" O'Reilly, and Spin Zone guest host Sean Hannity reference Tom DeLay, Glenn Beck, and Jullian Assange. Hannity accepts Cheney Invitation to go hunting from Hot Tub

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Should America Shoot the Wiki Messenger?

Englands Queen tells President Obama why shooting the Wiki messanger is not America's best choice.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, December 7, 2010

Are Corporate Businesses We Are Patronizing During the Holiday Season Supporting Our Nation?






Are Corporate Businesses We Are Patronizing During the Holiday Season Supporting Our Nation?

By RANDELL A. MONACO, Esq.
December 7, 2010


The current economic challenges have been tough for many, particularly those military reservists gearing up for active duty. On a positive note some of the tens of thousands of dedicated individuals and their families can look forward to some financial relief.
Going back to 2003, I assume that many of you have seen the reports about how Sears is treating its reservist employees who are called up for active duty overseas. Federal law requires only that their jobs are held open and available. The difference between their military pay and civilian income often creates a burden for those reservists and their families particularly when you consider the disruption of healthcare benefits.
There are some exemplary companies who have stepped up to support the sacrifices made by these reservist’s, some of whom have served more than one tour of duty over the protracted conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq. Sears has been one of these Companies, voluntarily paying the difference in salaries and maintaining all benefits, including medical insurance and bonus programs.
Another company supporting our military in these difficult times is the United Parcel Service who counts 4,000 to 5,000 of its 300,000 U.S. employees as reservists. In addition to making up the difference between the employees’ military service salary and their salary at UPS, the package delivery firm will also extend its health care and life insurance benefits to its reservist employees while they're on active duty. Under current regulations, reservists and their dependents get military health care for active duty of more than 30 days.
During this Holiday season I encourage everyone to be particularly supportive of companies like the United Parcel Service and Sears. As we shop and plan our gifting this year, a quick internet search in advance will tell you which companies and businesses are also supporting America as we all now carry the burdens of national debt , absent family members and in many cases the unthinkable.

Labels: , , ,

Saturday, December 4, 2010

Ron Santo dies at 70: WGN Radio career

Labels: , , ,

Ron Santo Chicago Cub Greatest Third Baseman ~ Rest In Peace


Ron Santo is the greatest third baseman in Chicago Cubs' history. He hit 342 career home runs and won five Gold Gloves. Playing all but one season with the Cubs, Santo never made it to the post-season. He hit 30 homers and batted .300 four times each, despite playing much of his career in an era where scoring was suppressed. He paced the National League in walks four times. He topped NL third basemen in putouts seven times, assists seven times, and double plays four times.

Santo was the first player to invoke his privilege under the "Ten and Five" rule, which states that a team cannot trade a player who has been in the league at least 10 years and been with that club for at least five, without his permission. In December, 1973, the Cubs wanted to trade Santo to the Angels for two young pitchers, but Santo refused. He agreed to be traded to the White Sox a week later.

Ronald Edward Santo was born on February 25, 1940, in Seattle, Washington. Ron Santo was signed as a free agent by the Chicago Cubs in 1959, and made his debut on June 26, 1960. On September 28, 2003, Santo's jersey #10 was retired by the Cubs organization, making him the third player so honored behind his teammates Ernie Banks (#14) and Billy Williams (#26). Ron is wildly popular in Chicago, having become a broadcaster after his playing career and still remains so. Ron Santo, rest in peace.

Labels: , , ,

Friday, December 3, 2010

Poor Manners the Analog Disconnect


Your Honor May I Be Heard
Poor Manners the Analog Disconnect
By RANDELL A. MONACO
Published: December 3, 2010

In a recent social media exchange, a new acquaintance pointed out a shared observation that the attention span of people seems the equivalent of a gnat these days. She went on to say that, “I have no idea how they put up with my statuses/comments.” I thought about this for awhile, were her social media experiences changing her social behavior, probably not but there was concern nevertheless. At first, I reasoned that this was a new phenomenon born of the 140 character limitation style of Twitter quips which might have carried on to the Facebook masses. I have since however, dismissed this theory not to be the case since few of these people are active on Twitter.

Actually, what I’ve observed is something different. A genuine change in social etiquette is my best description of what I’ve experienced. Interestingly, what I’ve actually observed in my relatively short social media existence is something that seems a more significant societal trend.
To explain, people who I’ve known well before social media became pervasive and who I knew did not practice these poor social traits I’m about to describe, seem oblivious to their behavior. It’s sort of a bantering slang canned into five to seven word slams and one up’s that disregard the already invested effort to discuss, understand or explain. You might call this trend a talk to the hand I don’t want to hear it type of behavior. Maybe this level of exchange is just a continuation of our globalized socialization, I’m not sure.

Worse, the behaviors I’m talking about even includes criticizing the gracious effort and expenditure of time take to respond or share with another whose agreed to a social exchange or “friendship.” Addressing more than one subject in a response to someone’s inquiry even seems too much in these social spaces. This trend has a cavalier acceptance of ignoring whatever you don’t want to hear regardless of whether it was by request. Something like, “don’t make me read just tell me the answer. I don’t want to hear the rest.”

Reading takes too much effort these days. In my perception of this trend, people want you to validate them in a word or two. It is as if their inquiry wasn’t ever made unless your response wasn’t concise enough for the validation sought. In short, it’s conduct that wouldn’t occur in person but has become tolerated, if not accepted, in the social spaces of the virtual world as if there was no connection to the analog world.

Recently, I had a “Facebook friend” tell me to “stop the political spamming and get a girl friend” as if they had been forced to listen to my ideas and thoughts or forced to read them. This cultural erosion of civility evidently has bestowed an editorial badge that grants censorship authority in the social spaces.

Different than the four letter name calling and loud personal attack all of us have witnessed during our lives, the evolving lack of decorum seems to be oblivious to the analog definition of rude. It is a level of insincerity, self centered; self absorbed disrespect newly incubated in the social media spaces. The perception of disconnect and relative absence of real accountability might explain this trend. It’s kind of like telling someone off over the phone.
The troubling concern in all this is that usually someone has already given their time and made the effort to socially share their idea or respond to a discussion thread.

Let’s be realistic, it is not always possible to read everything but should that justify the disrespect? Before Social Media did these people just throw away personal letters from their friends after asking for an opinion? Did they actually throw away most of their letters and send off criticisms when they didn’t get the answer or validation they wanted in a sentence?
Another aspect of this social phenomenon is the absence of meaningful exchange and consideration given to the ideas of another. Partisan slams, labels and personal attacks have replaced the effort required by dialogue.

There’s a perpetual circulation of partisan blame and never ending search to validate that has become the norm in social media dialogue. I call this trend, “talk to the hand.” In my brief social media existence an exchange with someone that might ask a question to better understand or contribute to understanding of the subject seems less frequent as time passes. Another rarity is an exchange where someone doesn’t have an opinion and actually says, “I don’t know.” Conclusion, opinions abound these days as if they were required.

One and two word responses such as “irrelevant” and “off point” regardless of fact to avoid further engaged effort aren’t the same behaviors that these people practiced in the analog world after someone show interest in their opinion. But most unfortunate is that these behaviors and social rudeness now seems to come from many people who once seem to have more inquisitive minds, better manners and understood the decorum of social exchange.
Maybe there is some explanation in that everyone does not have the same level of proficiency to type or use the keyboard as they do to write on paper. But I’m not going to look for more defenses to this unfortunate trend. These are just observations, I hope I’m wrong.

Labels: , , , , ,